That film was Dark Skies, which opened in first place with 136,000 units / $2.04 million. New releases were really weak with only one reaching the top ten on the DVD sales chart. PG-13 for street racing, violence, language and some sensuality.ĭVD Sales: Ray of Sunshine for Dark Skies September 30th, 2003 by Universal Home Entertainment
See the Box Office tab (Domestic) and International tab (International and Worldwide) for more Cumulative Box Office Records. Other than that, it's still a decent watch with better music and well-staged action sequences.All Time Domestic Box Office (Rank 501-600)Īll Time International Box Office (Rank 901-1,000)Īll Time Worldwide Box Office (Rank 601-700) It's not a bad follow up to the first movie, but not casting Vin Diesel wasn't smart - it's like missing a piece to a puzzle. Other than that, the story feels the same as before but without Vin Diesel. As for action scenes, the racing is still fast paced and contains much of the same film making as the first, which kept the feeling the same. The music produced by David Arnold of Stargate (1994) sounded better than BT's score from the first film but it wasn't evident enough. He's also able to make his character seem dangerous enough to hurt someone. He has a very smooth deep voice and resembles a very young Tom Berenger. Playing the drug lord is another interesting actor - Cole Hauser. Even with this though, their chemistry works well. Accompanying O'Conner is Roman Pearce (Tyrese Gibson) an old friend who originally has a grudge for some of his own issues. The new interest is Eva Mendes and she plays her character well enough. Here the same thing happens in a similar way.
This happened in the first movie and it blew O'Conners cover. But if there's one thing that comes into question, it is the concept of getting caught having a love interest in the business. The characters do reference material from the first film which shows the producers want to keep the story going and not divert completely from the original. Is was nice though that the writers kept the continuity together. Paul Walker is the central character but Vin Diesel's presence was the icing on the cake. Why does this plot sound like Vin Diesel's xXx (2002) plot line (except it doesn't deal with a drug lord)? Speaking of which, why didn't Vin Diesel return? That's one thing that this franchise consistently needs. Plus, if the drug lord is turned in, all of his criminal charges will disappear. And O'Conner can't refuse because he'd go to jail if he didn't accept. Heading the authorities is Agent Bilkins (Thom Barry) from the first installment and this time he wants O'Conner back one more time to take down a drug lord. The story follows ex-cop Brian O'Conner (Paul Walker) back to Miami from Los Angeles where he's enjoying his time racing street cars only to be pulled back by the authorities that he dropped. It wasn't bad at all but it was missing a few elements of the first movie, which left a more entertaining feeling. According to this site, this is lowest score the franchise has. Similar to many other sequels, it was distributed two years later and it's difficult to say whether it pleased fans as much as the first one did. And like most franchises with critical financial success, a sequel started to be put into the works. With the help of Paul Walker and Vin Diesel's chemistry and some intense racing scenes, Rob Cohen's The Fast and the Furious (2001) was an instant hit among racing fans.